periodic_interplay_7297

If a service prominently puts a clearnet url the algorithm must account for that . If you want kycnotme to be viewed as an impartial resource and for these scores to actually be taken seriously you need to fix the math . have a good day sir

Your thinking is flawed. A site offering a clearnet front door with twitter verification is a privacy liability by design .The existence of an onion address doesnt erase that clearnet users exist and your system gives them a false 100% seal of approval . Nobody is toggling js off just to browse the marketplace. You arent doing it either. Most are there for the trollbox . your algorithm rewards having an onion address so heavily that it papers over fundamental clearnet+js exposure ,then spits out a perfect privacy score that users will trust at face value .Youre scoring a site you financially support and displaying that score to its users . That arrangement alone should disqualify you from pretending objectivity here