peaceable_manger_4060

Let me break down exactly why this is a red flag: First, extended downtime happens to anyone, that's forgivable. What isn't forgivable is the communication pattern shown here. The owner admits they're "working on it" (good), but then immediately pivots to threatening bans for follow-up questions (very bad). This indicates several problems: no status page or public communication channel exists (forcing users to ask directly), zero patience for reasonable customer inquiries, and a fundamental misunderstanding that customers asking about downtime aren't being annoying; they're engaged users who want to keep using your product. When a service owner treats basic questions as bannable offenses, it suggests either severe burnout, ego issues, or both. Either way, that instability means your data or access could disappear at any moment because the person running things can't handle normal interactions. Not worth the risk.